From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Culligan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1980
79 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

December 23, 1980

Appeal from the Livingston County Court.

Present — Simons, J.P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, indictment reinstated and permission to resubmit granted memorandum: Defendant has been indicted for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law, § 220.39, subd 1) and petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.25). After reviewing the Grand Jury minutes, County Court granted defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment for insufficiency and denied the District Attorney's application to resubmit. The indictment charges that on November 17, 1978 defendant knowingly and unlawfully sold a white powder alleged to be a narcotic drug, cocaine, to an undercover agent for $200. In fact, subsequent laboratory tests established that the white powder was aspirin and therefore the second count of the indictment charged that defendant "with the intent to deprive another of property by false promise" did steal property, $200, from an undercover agent by selling a white powder alleged to be a narcotic drug. The order dismissing the indictment is reversed and permission to resubmit is granted (CPL 190.75, subd 3; 210.20, subd 4). The evidence before the Grand Jury was sufficient, if uncontradicted, to establish an attempt to sell a controlled substance, notwithstanding the fact that the substance actually transferred was aspirin (see People v. Reap, 68 A.D.2d 964; People v. Rosencrants, 89 Misc.2d 721). Nothing in the Grand Jury minutes establishes that defendant knew the powder was aspirin and if he believed that it was cocaine he may be guilty of an attempt to sell a controlled substance (Penal Law, § 110.10; and see La Fave Scott, Criminal Law, § 60, pp 438-442). The second count of the indictment charging petit larceny was also sufficient. It was not necessary to allege the manner by which the larceny was committed or the various elements of that method of committing the crime (see Penal Law, § 155.45, and Hechtman, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 39, Penal Law, § 155.45, p 164; People v. Farruggia, 41 A.D.2d 894).


Summaries of

People v. Culligan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1980
79 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Culligan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. GARY CULLIGAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1980

Citations

79 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Paul Sessions

The defendant contends that the crime of which he was convicted — attempted criminal sale of a controlled…

People v. Morgan

In contrast, where there is conclusive proof, by way of a "negative" laboratory analysis, that the substance…