From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Culbreath

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 31, 1998

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 20.00, 125.25 Penal [1]), attempted murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 20.00, 110.00 Penal, 125.25 Penal [1]) and other crimes in connection with a May 1993 shooting in the City of Buffalo. Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel by defense counsel's failure to offer into evidence the statement of co-defendant or to call certain witnesses. The statement of co-defendant did not qualify for admission into evidence as a declaration against penal interest ( see generally, People v. Settles, 46 N.Y.2d 154, 167). Moreover, even if the statement did so qualify, we conclude that defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel by reason of the failure to offer that statement into evidence. Additionally, Supreme Court did not err in denying defendant's pro se motion to set aside the verdict on that ground.

There is no merit to defendant's contention that the court erred in admitting photographs of the murder victim into evidence. Those photographs were relevant on the issue of intent ( see generally, People v. Pobliner, 32 N.Y.2d 356, 369-370, rearg denied 33 N.Y.2d 657, cert denied 416 U.S. 905).

Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his conviction of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the first degree is not supported by legally sufficient evidence ( see, People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10, 19). In any event, we conclude that the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Finally, we have considered the issues raised in defendant's pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they lack merit.

Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Culbreath

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1998
256 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Culbreath

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY CULBREATH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
684 N.Y.S.2d 111

Citing Cases

Culbreath v. Bennett

As to his alleged conflict claim, petitioner alleged that at sentencing, trial counsel became a witness…