From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cuddihi

Supreme Court of California
Nov 1, 1879
54 Cal. 53 (Cal. 1879)

Opinion

         Appeal from a judgment upon a demurrer to the indictment, in the County Court of Del Norte County.

         COUNSEL:

         J. Hamilton, Attorney-General, for Appellant.

          James E. Murphy, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         By the Court:

         The demurrer to the indictment was sustained. The defendant has not filed any points in support of the demurrer, but the only ground that seems to require notice, is that more than one offense is charged in the indictment. The indictment recites that the defendant is accused by the grand jury of the crime of " an assault with intent to commit murder, committed as follows." Following this is a statement of facts, showing that the defendant administered to John Nelson " a large quantity of a certain deadly poison, called red oxide of mercury," with the intent, etc., to murder said Nelson. The facts there stated appear to be sufficient to bring the case within the provisions of § 216 of the Penal Code; and they do not charge two offenses. The fact that the offense thus charged has not been given by the indictment its legal appellation, is not fatal to the indictment, as it is a mere irregularity in matter of form. The name given in the indictment to the offense charged, or sought to be charged, by the statement of facts constituting the offense, is not of itself the charge of an offense. (People v. Phipps, 39 Cal. 326.)

         Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the indictment. Remittitur forthwith.


Summaries of

People v. Cuddihi

Supreme Court of California
Nov 1, 1879
54 Cal. 53 (Cal. 1879)
Case details for

People v. Cuddihi

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. CUDDIHI

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 1, 1879

Citations

54 Cal. 53 (Cal. 1879)

Citing Cases

People v. Eppinger

An erroneous name given to a crime charged with sufficient clearness, as defined by the statute, does not…

In re Petition of Bergen

[1] It seems apparent that in any accusation the name given the offense by the pleader is separate from the…