From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cruz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1991
175 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 15, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

It is well settled that a claim that a jury verdict is repugnant is not preserved for appellate review unless an objection is raised before the jurors are discharged, at which time it is still possible to resubmit the matter to them (People v Alfaro, 66 N.Y.2d 985, 987; People v Hill, 161 A.D.2d 728). Because the defendant did not raise a claim of repugnancy prior to the discharge of the jury, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review.

In any event, the defendant's claim of repugnancy is without merit. Viewing the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see, People v Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1, 7), we find that the jury may have found the defendant guilty of assault in the second degree while concluding that he was not guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second or third degrees (see, People v Garcia, 52 N.Y.2d 716, affg 72 A.D.2d 356; People v Hudson, 163 A.D.2d 418). Thompson, J.P., Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cruz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1991
175 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN CRUZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 907

Citing Cases

People v. Moses

The defendant's claim that the jury's verdict was repugnant since the jury convicted him of assault in the…

People v. McDaniel

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Alfaro,…