Opinion
Motion No. 2022-02500 Ind. No. 270/2021
11-28-2022
The People, etc., appellant, v. Shimel Crum, respondent. The People, etc., appellant, v. Kareem James, respondent.
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
M286178
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, BETSY BARROS, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
The People having appealed from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 18, 2022, and the appeal having been perfected on August 9, 2022, and the defendant, Shimel Crum, having failed to timely file a brief in response thereto.
Now, in compliance with the requirements of People v Garcia (93 N.Y.2d 42):
SHIMEL CRUM IS HEREBY ADVISED
A. that he has the right to the assistance of counsel on the People's appeal;
B. that if he is financially unable to retain counsel he may make an application to this Court for the assignment of counsel, and, upon proof of such financial inability, one will be appointed for him;
C. that he has the right to forego the assistance of counsel and to respond to the People's appeal pro se; and
D. that unless within 60 days from the date of service of this decision and order on motion the defendant, Shimel Crum, either responds to the appeal pro se or by retained counsel, or moves for the appointment of counsel to represent him, he shall be deemed to have waived his right to counsel on the appeal and it shall be heard and determined on the People's brief alone.
On the Court's own motion, it is
ORDERED that the People are directed to serve a copy of this decision and order on motion, together with copies of their brief and the transcripts of the proceedings, upon the defendant, Shimel Crum, by personal delivery of the same to him; and it is further, ORDERED that the People shall file proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court within 20 days of the date hereof, via email at AD2Clerk@nycourts.gov; and it is further, ORDERED that the time of the defendant, Shimel Crum, to respond to the appeal pro se or by retained counsel, or to move for the assignment of counsel, is extended until 60 days after the date of service upon him of a copy of this decision and order on motion together with copies of the People's brief and the transcripts of the proceedings, and in the event that he fails to so respond to the appeal, or to move for the assignment of counsel within that time, or fails to move for an enlargement of time to respond to the appeal, the defendant, Shimel Crum, shall be deemed to have waived his right to counsel, and the appeal shall be considered and determined only on the People's brief and the original record; and it is further, ORDERED that if personal service of a copy of this decision and order on motion cannot be made with due diligence, the People may make ex parte application to this Court for an order authorizing alternative methods of service. Such an application shall be supported by affidavit or affidavits detailing the steps taken to find and serve the defendant, Shimel Crum, personally.
LASALLE, P.J., DILLON, DUFFY, BARROS and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.