From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Crispin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 8, 2016
145 A.D.3d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-08-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angel CRISPIN, Defendant–Appellant.

Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Kate Mollison of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael J. Yetter of counsel), for respondent.


Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Kate Mollison of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michael J. Yetter of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered April 1, 2014,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, ACOSTA, ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Crispin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 8, 2016
145 A.D.3d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Crispin

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angel CRISPIN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 8, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 498 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
145 A.D.3d 498
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8307