From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Credle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 2004
12 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-06553.

November 8, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.), rendered June 27, 2002, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: S. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's summation comments denied him a fair trial is largely unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Tonge, 93 NY2d 838; People v. Livigni, 288 AD2d 323). In any event, although some comments in the prosecutor's summation were improper, any prejudice to the defendant was mitigated by the court's actions in sustaining the defense counsel's objections and issuing curative instructions, and by the court's charge to the jury ( see People v. Thomas, 8 AD3d 303, lv denied 3 NY3d 682; People v. Howe, 292 AD2d 542, 542-543).


Summaries of

People v. Credle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 2004
12 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Credle

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN CREDLE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
783 N.Y.S.2d 850

Citing Cases

People v. Eugene

In any event, most of the challenged remarks constituted fair response to comments made during the defense…

People v. Dawkins

05; People v. Tonge, 93 NY2d 838, 839-840; People v. Livigni, 288 AD2d 323, 324). In any event, any prejudice…