From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Corley

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jun 29, 2018
913 N.W.2d 278 (Mich. 2018)

Opinion

SC: 155276 COA: 328532

06-29-2018

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Diallo CORLEY, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the trial court abused its discretion by declining to grant a new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence, and in particular, whether the trial court erred in concluding that the newly discovered evidence would not make a different result probable on retrial. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.


Summaries of

People v. Corley

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Jun 29, 2018
913 N.W.2d 278 (Mich. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Corley

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DIALLO CORLEY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Jun 29, 2018

Citations

913 N.W.2d 278 (Mich. 2018)