Opinion
Docket No. 152289. COA No. 327147.
02-02-2016
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Ricardo CORA–ROSARIO, Defendant–Appellant.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court to determine whether it would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED.
We do not retain jurisdiction.