From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 15, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obus, J.), rendered April 7, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree and burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a juvenile offender, to concurrent terms of 6 years to life and 3 1/3 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Donna Krone, for respondent.

Bruce D. Austern, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Wallach, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.


Defendant, who was 14 years old at the time of the murder, was properly convicted of felony murder based on the underlying crime of burglary in the first degree, a crime for which he was criminally responsible pursuant to Penal Law § 30.00(2). The felony murder count, which set forth every element of felony murder, was not rendered jurisdictionally defective by its lack of specificity as to the degree of burglary alleged to be the underlying act. To the extent that the indictment was required to provide defendant with notice that the defense of infancy did not apply in that the felony murder involved an underlying act for which defendant was criminally responsible, we conclude that the indictment provided defendant with ample notice (see, People v. Cohen, 52 N.Y.2d 584; see also, People v. Ray, 71 N.Y.2d 849; People v. Wright, 67 N.Y.2d 749, revg on dissenting opn, 112 A.D.2d 38, 39). Moreover, the court's explicit instruction to the jury that the People were required to prove that the underlying crime was first-degree burglary, which was also a separate count upon which defendant was convicted, further clarified the nature of the charge (see, People v. Johnson, 185 A.D.2d 860, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 975), and did not constitute a constructive amendment of the indictment.

Defendant's remaining contention was previously rejected by this Court upon defendant's motion for a reconstruction proceeding and there is no basis upon which to depart from that determination.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Colon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. ALEXANDER COLON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 15, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 35