From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 2001
287 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued October 4, 2001.

October 22, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered May 24, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Yvonne Shivers of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Diane R. Eisner of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly denied his Batson challenge (see, Batson v. Kennedy, 476 U.S. 79). The prosecutor's reason for challenging the subject juror was race-neutral and was supported by the record (cf., People v. McIndoe, 277 A.D.2d 252). The defendant failed to demonstrate that the reason given by the prosecutor was pretextual (see, People v. Payne, 88 N.Y.2d 171, 182; People v. Allen, 86 N.Y.2d 101, 109-110; People v. Ritchie, 217 A.D.2d 84, 87).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 2001
287 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. MARK COLEMAN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 22, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 648 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 869

Citing Cases

Torres v. Educational Alliance, Inc.

After the defendants provided facially-neutral reasons for rejecting the challenged jurors (see People v.…

People v. Doyle

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court properly denied his Batson challenge (see Batson v.…