Opinion
January, 1904.
Judgment affirmed.
The same questions are presented in this case as in the case of People v. Putnam ( ante p. 125). We therein indicated our reasons for affirming that judgment, and what is there said will apply to this case, there being no substantial difference in the questions presented. For the reasons there stated the judgment is affirmed. Van Brunt, P.J., Patterson, Hatch and Laughlin, JJ., concurred.