Opinion
April 14, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan C. Sudolnick, J.).
In this trial for burglary, the trial court properly excluded a statement allegedly made to the police by the codefendant (who was not jointly tried with defendant), that she had permission to enter the apartment. The codefendant's statement was made after she and defendant had exited the burglarized apartment, and thus was not relevant to defendant's state of mind when he entered the apartment. We have considered the remaining arguments, including those raised in defendant's pro se supplemental brief, and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.