From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chiovaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 18, 2001
279 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 18, 2001.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered October 12, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Richard W. Rich Jr., Public Defender, Elmira, for appellant.

John R. Trice, District Attorney (Adam M. Gee of counsel), Elmira, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Defendant, an inmate at Elmira Correctional Facility in Chemung County, was indicted and charged with promoting prison contraband in the first degree. Following an unsuccessful attempt to have the indictment dismissed on the ground of prearrest delay, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 1 1/2; to 3 years. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. The record reflects that defendant was discovered in possession of a razor blade on October 9, 1998. The incident was reported to the State Police on November 21, 1998 and, following an investigation by the State Police, the matter was referred to the District Attorney on March 31, 1999. On April 26, 1999, six months and 17 days after the incident occurred, the matter was presented to the Grand Jury. While it is undisputed that an unreasonable and unjustifiable delay in prosecuting a defendant may necessitate dismissal of an indictment (see, People v. Johnson, 226 A.D.2d 806, 807, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 937), the minimal delay here of six months did not result in a deprivation of defendant's due process rights, especially inasmuch as defendant has neither claimed nor demonstrated any prejudice by reason of such delay (see, e.g., People v. Smith, 272 A.D.2d 713, 714, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 871; People v. Allah, 264 A.D.2d 902, 903; People v. Medina, 262 A.D.2d 708, 710, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 1023).

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Chiovaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 18, 2001
279 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Chiovaro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL CHIOVARO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 18, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
718 N.Y.S.2d 726

Citing Cases

People v. Richardson

Defendant was indicted on September 7, 2000. Upon our review, we find that the relatively brief period of…

People v. Lake

The Court of Appeals has firmly established that claims of preindictment prosecutorial delay are to be…