From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1987
134 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

November 9, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Grajales, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Suppression of the weapon recovered from the defendant was properly denied. The police officer, who was acting upon a radio broadcast containing information which had been supplied by an identified citizen informant concerning a man with a gun outside a high school, had a reasonable suspicion and was justified in briefly detaining the defendant and frisking him for a weapon. The information provided by the informant was based upon his personal observation and was fairly detailed as to the suspect's color, build and clothing and also as to the vehicle from which he had emerged and the direction in which he was headed. Upon leaving the high school building where he was posted, the officer immediately saw a vehicle matching the description provided in the broadcast. When he questioned some students as to the whereabouts of the man who had been in the vehicle, they pointed to the defendant, who was about one-half block away. The officer observed that the defendant was wearing a red three-quarter-length down coat and glasses, which conformed to the description of the suspect provided by the informant. Under these circumstances, based on the information in the radio report and his own observations, the officer could assume the reliability of the information which gave rise to a reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct, and was justified in taking action based upon it (see, People v. Benjamin, 51 N.Y.2d 267, 271). The brief detention and removal of the defendant to a nearby restaurant to conduct the frisk was a reasonable response to the circumstances. At the time the officer encountered the defendant, he was in the midst of a group of 60 to 70 high school students and given the officer's reasonable suspicion that defendant was armed, he was justified, for reasons of both his own safety as well as that of the students in the area, in briefly removing the defendant to a more secure location. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 9, 1987
134 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Cherry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC CHERRY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1987

Citations

134 A.D.2d 358 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Townsend

We conclude that in light of the circumstances, the police officer acted within the bounds of the law, and…