From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chatman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 18, 2000
268 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

January 18, 2000

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered September 23, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 1/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Polly Samuels, for respondent.

Kristina Ross, for defendant-appellant.

ROSENBERGER, J.P., ELLERIN, WALLACH, LERNER, ANDRIAS, JJ.


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. Defendant did not establish an expectation of privacy in the apartment in which he was arrested. The record further establishes that the entry into the apartment was, in any event, justified by hot pursuit and exigent circumstances (see, United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38;People v. Mealer, 57 N.Y.2d 214).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Chatman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 18, 2000
268 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Chatman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIE CHATMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 18, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 299 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
700 N.Y.S.2d 818

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

ntry justified by hot pursuit and there was a need to act quickly to prevent destruction of evidence); Warden…

People v. Williams

ntry justified by hot pursuit and there was a need to act quickly to prevent destruction of evidence); Warden…