Opinion
Submitted October 24, 2000.
November 21, 2000.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered June 15, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.
Ethel P. Ross, Rye, N.Y., for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Adam Charnoff of counsel), for respondent.
Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., DAVID S. RITTER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his motion which was to suppress his statements. The defendant's claim that his statements were physically coerced is belied by his appearance in his arrest photograph and his appearance and demeanor during his videotaped statement (see, People v. Williams, 226 A.D.2d 750; People v. Turner, 200 A.D.2d 603). The credibility determinations of the hearing court are entitled to great deference, as it saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759; People v. Grieco, 262 A.D.2d 656).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Gonzalez, 55 N.Y.2d 887; People v. Bellow, 255 A.D.2d 450) and, in any event, are without merit.