From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Chaney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 3, 2002
294 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

KA 00-01822

May 3, 2002.

Appeal from a judgment of Monroe County Court (Egan, J.), entered March 10, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of insurance fraud in the third degree.

CHAMBERLAIN D'AMANDA OPPENHEIMER GREENFIELD, ROCHESTER (RAJA N. SEKHARAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

HOWARD R. RELIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (WENDY EVANS LEHMANN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GREEN, HURLBUTT, BURNS, AND LAWTON, JJ.


It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of insurance fraud in the third degree (Penal Law § 176.20). Prior to sentencing, defendant made a pro se motion to withdraw his plea on the ground that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Defendant stated that defense counsel had refused to consider allowing him to call any witnesses, had not spent sufficient time with him, had not prepared an adequate defense, and had pressured him to plead guilty. Defense counsel addressed the merits of defendant's motion, disputing defendant's factual assertions. We conclude that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel when his attorney took a position that was adverse to that of defendant and became a witness against him ( see People v. Stephens, 291 A.D.2d 841; People v. Lewis, 286 A.D.2d 934, 935; People v. Pittman, 270 A.D.2d 883, 884; People v. Chrysler, 233 A.D.2d 928). Although defense counsel had no duty to support defendant's pro se motion, she "could not take a position that was adverse to that of [her] client" ( People v. Betsch, 286 A.D.2d 887). "The court should have assigned a different attorney to represent defendant before it determined the motion to withdraw the plea" ( Pittman, 270 A.D.2d at 884). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Monroe County Court for the assignment of counsel and a de novo determination of the motion to withdraw the guilty plea.


Summaries of

People v. Chaney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 3, 2002
294 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Chaney

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ULICE CHANEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 3, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 931 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 776

Citing Cases

People v. Wesley Kirkland

County Court "should not have determined the motion[] [to withdraw the plea] without first assigning a…

People v. Lee

Consequently, the court "should not have determined the motion[ and request to withdraw the plea] without…