From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1997
237 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 31, 1997.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered February 29, 1996, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made to the police.

Before: Miller, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Krausman, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On appeal, the defendant contends that his statements to the police should have been suppressed because they were the product of an illegal detention and arrest. Since the defendant failed to raise these claims in his moving papers or at the suppression hearing, they are unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011; People v Alexander, 226 AD2d 548).

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case ( see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Cea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1997
237 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Cea

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN CEA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 1006

Citing Cases

People v. Morales

The defendant's contentions that his arrest in the hallway outside his apartment was unlawful, and that…

People v. Hill

This contention is unpreserved for appellate review, since the defendant never raised this issue at the…