From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Castro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 6, 1992
180 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 6, 1992

Appeal from the County Court, Greene County (Battisti, Jr., J.).


The record before us clearly shows that defendant waived his right to appeal as part of a negotiated plea bargain, that the waiver was knowing and voluntary, and that he fully understood the consequences of the waiver (see, People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1; People v. Brown, 160 A.D.2d 1039). In any event, even if it is accepted that under the facts of this case the People were required to notify defendant of identification evidence they intended to use against him, his suppression motion on this question waived any objection concerning the timeliness of such notice (see, CPL 710.30; People v. Bolling, 142 A.D.2d 733, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 955; People v. Rivera, 73 A.D.2d 528, affd 53 N.Y.2d 1005). The remaining contentions raised by defendant have been considered and rejected as either being waived or lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J.P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

People v. Castro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 6, 1992
180 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Castro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SANTO LI CASTRO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)