From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1998
254 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Rosalyn Richter, J.).


Since defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was made on clearly different grounds, his contention that his plea allocution was factually insufficient to establish his guilt of burglary in the third degree is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that defendant's intent to commit a crime was sufficiently inferable from his factual recitations ( see, People v. McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905). No statement at the plea cast significant doubt upon defendant's guilt.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Carter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 27, 1998
254 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK v. RICHARD CARTER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 27, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 568

Citing Cases

People v. Covell

Because we conclude that defendant is partially correct, we must remit the matter to County Court for…