Opinion
May 17, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bonnie Wittner, J.).
Defendant's claim regarding CPL 60.25 is unpreserved for review (People v. Morton, 189 A.D.2d 488, 495), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it we would find it without merit. The identification testimony of the two eyewitnesses, who were unable to positively identify defendant at trial, satisfied all the requirements of CPL 60.25 and was thus properly admitted into evidence.
Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Ross, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.