From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carolan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued June 28, 1999

October 4, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.).


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his argument that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish the intent element of the charge of attempted murder in the second degree ( see, CPL 470.05). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORIO, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Carolan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 4, 1999
265 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Carolan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. WILLIAM CAROLAN, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 683

Citing Cases

People v. Garcia

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review…

People v. Carolan

October 1, 2001. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…