From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Carbonaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1989
151 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 12, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Broomer, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On March 4, 1982, the defendant and his counsel appeared in court and were informed that trial was to begin that afternoon at 2:00 P.M., and a courtroom was assigned. The defendant failed to appear at that time, however, and the case was put off until the following day. Upon the defendant's failure to appear at that time also, a hearing was held, following which the court determined that the defendant's absence was knowing and voluntary and calculated to defeat the ends of justice. The court thereafter proceeded with the pretrial hearings, but held the trial over the weekend until Monday, to give the defendant every opportunity to appear. The defendant did not appear, and the trial was conducted without him.

The defendant was properly tried and sentenced in absentia as his conduct in absconding shortly before the beginning of trial indicated "a defiance of the processes of law and disrupted the trial after all parties [were] assembled and ready to proceed" (People v. Sanchez, 65 N.Y.2d 436, 444; People v. Ellerbe, 115 A.D.2d 614; cf., People v. Parker, 57 N.Y.2d 136).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Carbonaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1989
151 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Carbonaro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS CARBONARO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
542 N.Y.S.2d 351

Citing Cases

People v. Nance

Reasonable efforts to locate him proved unsuccessful. We find that under the circumstances, the defendant…

People v. Marshall

The defendant's contention that he could not have waived his right to be present at the pretrial hearing and…