From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Camacho

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Feb 5, 2021
70 Misc. 3d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)

Opinion

2019-234 Q CR

02-05-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan CAMACHO, Appellant.

Martin Geoffrey Goldberg, for appellant. Queens County District Attorney ( John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel), for respondent.


Martin Geoffrey Goldberg, for appellant. Queens County District Attorney ( John M. Castellano and Johnnette Traill of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: MICHELLE WESTON, J.P., DAVID ELLIOT, WAVNY TOUSSAINT, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted ( see id. ; People v Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

WESTON, J.P., ELLIOT and TOUSSAINT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Camacho

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Feb 5, 2021
70 Misc. 3d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
Case details for

People v. Camacho

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan Camacho…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Feb 5, 2021

Citations

70 Misc. 3d 138 (N.Y. App. Term 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50082
138 N.Y.S.3d 788