From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Calderon

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Dec 16, 2019
2d Crim. No. B299076 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2019)

Opinion

2d Crim. No. B299076

12-16-2019

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CECILIA DESIREE CALDERON, Defendant and Appellant.

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. 2018019225)
(Ventura County)

Cecilia Desiree Calderon appeals following her guilty plea to unlawfully driving or taking a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)), driving under the influence of drugs (id., § 23152, subd. (f)), and two counts of battery (Pen. Code, § 242). The trial court sentenced her to one year in county jail and ordered that term to run consecutively to the three-year county jail term she was already serving in another case.

Because appellant pled guilty prior to a preliminary hearing, the relevant facts are derived from the probation report. Appellant was backing her car out of a parking spot when she hit Joseph Gonzales's vehicle. When Gonzalez stood behind appellant's vehicle to prevent her from leaving, she continued backing up and hit him in the leg. She then got out and punched Gonzalez in the face. The police arrived and arrested appellant after determining she was under the influence of drugs.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, he filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. On October 9, 2019, we advised appellant by mail that she had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues she wished us to consider. The mail, which was sent to appellant's address of record, was returned as undeliverable. Counsel subsequently confirmed that he had no other address for appellant.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

PERREN, J. We concur:

YEGAN, Acting P.J.

TANGEMAN, J.

Bruce A. Young, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Summaries of

People v. Calderon

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Dec 16, 2019
2d Crim. No. B299076 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2019)
Case details for

People v. Calderon

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CECILIA DESIREE CALDERON…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: Dec 16, 2019

Citations

2d Crim. No. B299076 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2019)