From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cahill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1976
54 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

November 8, 1976


Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Westchester County, dated December 8, 1975, which granted the branch of defendant's motion which sought to dismiss the indictment for failure to accord him a speedy trial. Order affirmed. It is undisputed that more than six months elapsed between the time this prosecution was commenced, by indictment, and the time the People were ready for trial. Since there were no "exceptional circumstances" (see CPL 30.30, subd 4, par [g]), and no other circumstances which served to toll the statutory period, dismissal of the indictment was mandated (see CPL 30.30, subd 1, par [a]; 30.30, subd 4). Martuscello, Acting P.J., Latham, Cohalan, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Cahill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1976
54 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

People v. Cahill

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. RICHARD CAHILL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 938 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

People v. Sims

Thus, from the filing of the sealed indictment on June 5, 1974 until January 24, 1975, a period of 7 months…

People v. Rodney

"CPL 30.30 is a mandatory provision pursuant to which a motion to dismiss must be granted where the People…