Opinion
December 30, 1993
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Bookson, J.).
The trial court properly determined that the failure of the prosecution to furnish the defense with a list of mug shots resembling defendant was attributable to either loss or destruction. The court considered the degree of prosecutorial fault and resulting prejudice to the defendant, and imposed an appropriate sanction in the form of an adverse inference charge (People v Banch, 80 N.Y.2d 610, 616; People v Morton, 189 A.D.2d 488, 492-493).
Defendant failed to raise any challenge to the procedures utilized in determining and imposing sentence in the trial court and thus his claim is not preserved (CPL 470.05; People v Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 281). If we were to reach defendant's claim, we would find that there is no evidence that the trial court improperly punished defendant for crimes of which he was acquitted. In any event, we find no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed.
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.