From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bynum

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-28-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jermaine BYNUM, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Laura B. Tatelman of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jill Oziemblewski of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY (Laura B. Tatelman of counsel), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jill Oziemblewski of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murphy, J.), imposed July 17, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record of the plea proceeding is inadequate to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal, and thus, the purported waiver of his right to appeal is not enforceable (see People v. Matos, 102 A.D.3d 890, 891, 957 N.Y.S.2d 902 ). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., BALKIN, DICKERSON, HINDS–RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bynum

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Bynum

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jermaine BYNUM, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6226
37 N.Y.S.3d 904

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.The record of the plea proceeding does not demonstrate that the…

People v. Smith

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed. The record of the plea proceeding does not demonstrate that the…