From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Butterfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 15, 2004
9 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

13230.

July 15, 2004.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered June 25, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.


In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery in the first degree and was sentenced to a prison term of eight years, followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, contending that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive and that extraordinary circumstances, consisting of his positive progress in a drug treatment program and lack of felony convictions, warrant a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice. We disagree. Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement and, given the violent nature of the crime, his prior criminal history and his long-standing substance abuse, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed ( see People v. Smith, 2 AD3d 1057, lv denied 2 NY3d 746; People v. Mondolfi, 309 AD2d 975).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Butterfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 15, 2004
9 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Butterfield

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STANLEY BUTTERFIELD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 15, 2004

Citations

9 A.D.3d 682 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
779 N.Y.S.2d 820

Citing Cases

People v. Johnson

Lastly, we reject defendant's contention that his prison term was harsh and excessive and that extraordinary…

People v. Dolison

The sentence imposed is not harsh and excessive under the circumstances. Indeed, despite defendant's prior…