Opinion
2019–06233 2021–02226 2021–02227 Ind. No. 1157/18, S.C.I. Nos.1507/18, 2161/18
04-14-2021
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Keith T. BUTLER, appellant.
Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Louis E. Mazzola of counsel), for appellant. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Grazia DiVincenzo and Marion Tang of counsel), for respondent.
Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Louis E. Mazzola of counsel), for appellant.
Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Grazia DiVincenzo and Marion Tang of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mark D. Cohen, J.), all rendered January 7, 2019, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under Superior Court Information No. 1507/18, grand larceny in the fourth degree under Indictment No. 1157/18, and attempted assault in the second degree and aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate under Superior Court Information No. 2161/18, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.
The defendant's contention that his pleas of guilty were not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his pleas prior to the imposition of the sentences (see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665–666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 ; cf. CPL 220.60[3] ). In any event, the contention is without merit, as the record demonstrates that his pleas of guilty were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see People v. Goldstein, 12 N.Y.3d 295, 301, 879 N.Y.S.2d 814, 907 N.E.2d 692 ; People v. Seeber, 4 N.Y.3d 780, 780–781, 793 N.Y.S.2d 826, 826 N.E.2d 797 ). Further, the defendant's postplea assertions of innocence contradicted the admissions made under oath at the plea allocutions and were insufficient to warrant further inquiry by the County Court (see People v. Lopez–Hilario, 178 A.D.3d 1078, 1078–1079, 112 N.Y.S.3d 564 ; People v. Stephensbush, 172 A.D.3d 1108, 1109, 100 N.Y.S.3d 322 ).
DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.