From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 19, 1995
220 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 19, 1995

Appeal from the County Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J.).


After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced as a predicate felon to a prison term of 121/2 to 25 years. Defendant argues that County Court abused its discretion in considering defendant's statement in which he denied possessing drugs as a factor in imposing the harshest possible sentence. Upon our review of the sentencing transcript, we do not find that County Court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant. County Court considered the subject statement as indicative of defendant's lack of remorse for his actions. It also considered defendant's past criminal history and the nature of the crime. Moreover, insofar as the cases relied upon by defendant involved sentences imposed in connection with plea agreements, we find them distinguishable from the case at hand ( see, e.g., People v. Carr, 135 A.D.2d 722; People v. Daniels, 132 A.D.2d 667).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Burk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 19, 1995
220 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Burk

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN BURK, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 891 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Citing Cases

People v. Cato

The Supreme Court has broad discretion to limit cross-examination when questions are repetitive, irrelevant…