From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Burford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1984
105 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 13, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (McMahon, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The jury's verdict, which found defendant guilty of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree but acquitted him of kidnapping in the first degree, was not repugnant in view of the elements of the crimes as charged ( People v Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1). In any event, the defendant's claim of a repugnant verdict was not preserved for appellate review as his counsel failed to raise an objection thereto at trial (CPL 470.05; People v Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745; People v Figueroa, 96 A.D.2d 515).

We do not find error in the admission of expert testimony regarding the existence of gunpowder stains on the towel which the defendant used to cover the gun. Although the complainant was unable to state whether the towel was wrapped around the gun at the time it was fired by the defendant, there was evidence in the record upon which one could conclude that the towel was in close proximity to the gun at that time. Weinstein, J.P., Brown, Boyers and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Burford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 1984
105 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Burford

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CLEMENT BURFORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Waytes

The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict (see People v Bigelow, 106 A.D.2d 448); the verdict…

People v. Pagan

The defendant's contention that the jury's verdict on two counts of the indictment was inconsistent or…