Opinion
2017–08508 S.C.I. No. 212/14
05-15-2019
The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Amanda BURDICK, Appellant.
Hogan & Rossi, Brewster, N.Y. (MaryJane MacCrae of counsel), for appellant. Robert V. Tendy, District Attorney, Carmel, N.Y. (David M. Bishop of counsel), for respondent.
Hogan & Rossi, Brewster, N.Y. (MaryJane MacCrae of counsel), for appellant.
Robert V. Tendy, District Attorney, Carmel, N.Y. (David M. Bishop of counsel), for respondent.
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J. RUTH C. BALKIN ROBERT J. MILLER SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.
DECISION & ORDERORDERED that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by providing that the terms of imprisonment shall run concurrently with each other; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein.
SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, MILLER and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.