From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bunnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. KA 06-03548.

June 5, 2009.

Present: Smith, J.P., Centra, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ.


Motion for reargument and other relief granted to the extent that, upon rear-gument, the memorandum and order entered February 6, 2009 ( 59 AD3d 942) is amended by adding the following sentences before the last sentence of the memorandum: "It cannot be said that the procedure utilized by the court is authorized by People v Fuller ( 57 NY2d 152). Indeed, the court attorney did not act merely as a 'preliminary fact finder' ( id. at 158) but, rather, he conducted an adversarial hearing and made credibility determinations, thereby assuming a role specifically limited to the authority of the court ( see Penal Law § 60.27; Fuller, 57 NY2d at 158-159)."


Summaries of

People v. Bunnell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 5, 2009
63 A.D.3d 1671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Bunnell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GERRI L. BUNNELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 5, 2009

Citations

63 A.D.3d 1671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4678
879 N.Y.S.2d 801

Citing Cases

People v. Joseph

Penal Law § 60.27(2) provides that, “[i]f the record does not contain sufficient evidence [of the amount of…

People v. Hensley

Here, there was ample evidence from which the jury could conclude that defendant constructively possessed the…