From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 1990
166 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 18, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Ross, J.P., Kassal, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 18, 1990
166 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Bun

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL BUN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)