From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bullock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 8, 1996.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Before: Present — Lawton, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Defendant contends that the suppression court's findings that his mother invited the police into her home and thus that the police had a legitimate right to be there when they took defendant into custody are contrary to the weight of the evidence. We disagree. Although conflicting testimony was presented concerning what defendant's mother said when the police entered the home, County Court's resolution of that credibility issue is entitled to considerable weight, and we perceive no basis in this record to disturb it ( see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Bullock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 8, 1996
233 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Bullock

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. REGGIE BULLOCK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 958 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 898

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

The detective who conducted the interrogation testified that he administered Miranda warnings before…