From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Budden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 2010
77 A.D.3d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-06037.

October 5, 2010.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), rendered May 27, 2009, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant.

Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Laurie K. Gibbons and Cristin N. Connell of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo, Hall and Roman, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal ( see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273), precludes review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution ( see People v Murphy, 55 AD3d 930; People v McCarthy, 53 AD3d 589; People v Nash, 38 AD3d 684).

To the extent that the defendant is claiming that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, this issue is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v Johnson, 73 AD3d 951; People v Murphy, 55 AD3d 930; People v Rodriguez, 51 AD3d 1043), and the case does not fall within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement ( see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently ( see People v Rodriguez-Ovalles, 74 AD3d 1368; see also People v Pons, 68 NY2d 264, 267).


Summaries of

People v. Budden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 5, 2010
77 A.D.3d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Budden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEONARD BUDDEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 5, 2010

Citations

77 A.D.3d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 7183
908 N.Y.S.2d 362

Citing Cases

People v. James

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. The defendant's contention that his pleas of guilty were not…

People v. Fontanet

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's oral…