From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 2, 2001
285 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 18, 2001.

July 2, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered March 11, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, and Valerie L. Forbes of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

On July 6, 1998, an undercover officer was engaged in a "buy and bust" operation in the vicinity of Nostrand Avenue and Pacific Street in Brooklyn. After expressing a desire to buy drugs, the officer was directed to the defendant by the defendant's accomplice. The officer used $10 in prerecorded money to purchase one packet of cocaine from the defendant, who was standing on the sidewalk at a table displaying oils and incense. The sale was witnessed by a second undercover "ghost officer" who was positioned nearby. After completion of the transaction, the defendant entered and then exited a store at the location, while both officers radioed the backup team, providing detailed descriptions of the defendant. The defendant was apprehended at the scene shortly thereafter. The police recovered five dollars in prerecorded money from the defendant's person.

The defendant argues that the characterization of him in the prosecutor's opening and closing statements as being in the "business" of selling drugs deprived him of a fair trial by suggesting that he had engaged in other drug sales. However, by failing to specifically object to these comments at trial, the defendant has not preserved his argument for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641). In any event, any error must be deemed harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Brown, 223 A.D.2d 597; People v. Clausell, 223 A.D.2d 598; People v. Blackstock, 184 A.D.2d 775).

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, McGINITY and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 2, 2001
285 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. CALVIN BROWN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 2, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 633