Opinion
May 10, 1993
Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant Lorraine Brown was one of three women who took part in a concerted attack on the victim (see, People v Allums, 193 A.D.2d 687 [decided herewith]; People v Allums, 193 A.D.2d 688 [decided herewith]).
Contrary to the arguments of the defendant Lorraine Brown, the verdict was not repugnant (see, People v Allums, 193 A.D.2d 688, supra), the CPL 710.30 notice furnished by the People was sufficient to inform her of the sum and substance of her pretrial statement (see, People v Murphy, 163 A.D.2d 425; People v Holmes, 170 A.D.2d 534), and the trial court took adequate curative measures when it discovered that some jurors were taking notes (see, People v Stewart, 179 A.D.2d 731; People v Valenti, 163 A.D.2d 441; People v DiLuca, 85 A.D.2d 439).
The defendant's remaining arguments are also without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.