From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1998
256 A.D.2d 92 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 10, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.).


We find that totality of the record establishes that defendant voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his rights under People v. Antommarchi ( 80 N.Y.2d 247, 250), to be present at certain sidebar conferences with prospective jurors. Although the waiver was conveyed by counsel, defendant was clearly aware of his right to be present, since he exercised that right by participating in other such conferences ( People v. Santana, 247 A.D.2d 201, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 977) and was present when counsel thereafter waived in open court.

Concur — Lerner, P. J., Ellerin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1998
256 A.D.2d 92 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEPHEN BROWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 92 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 572

Citing Cases

People v. Velez

" Subsequently, the prospective jurors were questioned individually by the trial court and counsel in the…

People v. McAdams

This argument is unavailing. In our view, County Court's comment regarding defendant's right to be present at…