From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 2003
307 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

KA 03-00294

July 3, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Tills, J.), entered February 20, 2002, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

MICHAEL M. BLOTNIK, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK J. CLARK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DON I. DALLY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, BURNS, LAWTON, AND HAYES, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50(5).

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment resentencing him upon a probation violation, defendant contends that the original sentence of probation violates Penal Law 60.01(2)(d). That contention is not properly before us inasmuch as there is no notice of appeal from the original judgment in the record before us, nor is there otherwise any indication in the record that an appeal from that judgment was perfected ( see People v. Reddy, 227 A.D.2d 961, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 1024; People v. Dabbs, 178 A.D.2d 848, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 946).


Summaries of

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 3, 2003
307 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ERNEST BROWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 3, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 547

Citing Cases

The People v. Johnson

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation previously imposed upon his…

People v. Ruddy

As such, any questions regarding the original conviction and sentence are not properly before us on this…