From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brooks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1999
258 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

February 8, 1999

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Vaughn, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel when his attorney ignored his desire to testify before the Grand Jury and informed the District Attorney that he did not wish to testify. Even assuming these allegations to be true, we find no merit to his contention. A defense counsel's failure to effectuate a defendant's right to testify before the Grand Jury does not, in and of itself, constitute a denial of effective assistance of counsel ( see, People v. Wiggins, 89 N.Y.2d 872; People v. Oppenheimer, 240 A.D.2d 437; People v. Rogers, 228 A.D.2d 623; cf., People v. Jimenez, 180 A.D.2d 757).

Miller, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Brooks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1999
258 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GLENN A. BROOKS, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1999

Citations

258 A.D.2d 527 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
685 N.Y.S.2d 273

Citing Cases

State v. Onyeabor

People v. McLaurin, 237 AD2d 382, 382 (1997).Id.; People v. Brooks, 258 AD2d 527, 528 (1999); see also People…

People v. Williams

In the instant case, there is no evidence in the record that either the defendant or his attorney ever gave…