From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1975
48 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Summary

In People v. Brock (48 A.D.2d 790) this court had occasion to reaffirm the principle that a defendant who absconds waives his right to be present at trial and at sentence.

Summary of this case from Root v. Kapelman

Opinion

June 12, 1975


Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered December 5, 1972, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder and possession of a weapon as a felony, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment not exceeding 25 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, insofar as it imposes sentence and the case remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for resentence; and otherwise affirmed. On the record before us, there was an effective waiver of defendant's right to be present during the trial and at sentencing. However, it appears that sentence was pronounced before receipt of the probation report required by the statute. (CPL 390.20, subd 1.) Accordingly, we remand for resentence only, in accordance with the statutory mandate.

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Brock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 1975
48 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

In People v. Brock (48 A.D.2d 790) this court had occasion to reaffirm the principle that a defendant who absconds waives his right to be present at trial and at sentence.

Summary of this case from Root v. Kapelman
Case details for

People v. Brock

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HAROLD BROCK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1975

Citations

48 A.D.2d 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Root v. Kapelman

(See People v. Epps, supra; People ex rel. Lupo v. Fay, 13 N.Y.2d 253, cert den 376 U.S. 958; People ex rel.…

People v. Villegas

Under CPL 390.20 (1), the court is required to consider a presentence report before imposing sentence in a…