From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bramble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 30, 1992
182 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 30, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Antonio I. Brandveen, J.).


Defendant's argument that he was deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor's summation is not preserved (People v Moore, 157 A.D.2d 538, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 968), and we decline to reach it. Were we to consider it in the interest of justice, we would find that the comments in question were a proper and fair response to comments made by the defense (People v Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v Rodriguez, 159 A.D.2d 356, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 795).

In view of the heinous nature of the acts charged, and notwithstanding defendant's age and lack of a prior felony record, the sentence is not excessive (see, People v Junco, 43 A.D.2d 266, 268, affd 35 N.Y.2d 419, cert denied 421 U.S. 951).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Bramble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 30, 1992
182 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Bramble

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENRICK BRAMBLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Harrison

"[I]t is apparent that the sentencing court, uniquely familiar with the particularly heinous circumstances of…