Opinion
2012-01-10
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Lloyd BRAHAM, appellant.
Marshall L. Goldstein, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (William C. Milaccio, Lois Cullen Valerio, and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.
Marshall L. Goldstein, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (William C. Milaccio, Lois Cullen Valerio, and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, L. PRISCILLA HALL, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Hubert, J.), rendered July 25, 2008, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for a new trial.
The defendant contends that the prosecution failed to prove his guilt by legally sufficient evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15[5]; People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1), we nevertheless accord great deference to the fact-finder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor ( see People v. Mateo, 2 N.Y.3d 383, 779 N.Y.S.2d 399, 811 N.E.2d 1053, cert. denied 542 U.S. 946, 124 S.Ct. 2929, 159 L.Ed.2d 828; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902).
Nonetheless, the judgment of conviction must be reversed, and a new trial ordered. The County Court erred in allowing the defendant's jury to hear the defense of codefendant Warren Davis. Prior to trial, the County Court granted a partial severance calling for the defendant and Davis to be tried jointly but before two separate juries. During the People's case, the County Court adhered to its decision and excluded the defendant's jury from portions of the testimony relating to Davis's statements to law enforcement. However, the County Court improperly allowed the defendant's jury to hear the codefendant Davis's case at trial. Davis's counsel took an aggressive adversarial stance against the defendant and elicited damaging evidence against him, creating the sort of compelling prejudice that could have been avoided by the grant of the requested total severance ( see People v. Cardwell, 78 N.Y.2d 996, 575 N.Y.S.2d 267, 580 N.E.2d 753; People v. Mahboubian, 74 N.Y.2d 174, 544 N.Y.S.2d 769, 543 N.E.2d 34; People v. Hikel, 180 A.D.2d 820, 581 N.Y.S.2d 801).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contentions.