From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Brady

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Feb 4, 2008
No. B194594 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 4, 2008)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BILL BRADY, Defendant and Appellant. B194594 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Sixth Division February 4, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

Superior Court County No. F378899, of San Luis Obispo, Dodie A. Harman, Judge

California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director, and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

GILBERT, P.J.

Bill Brady appeals a judgment of conviction entered after he expressly waived his constitutional rights and pleaded guilty to assault by means of force likely to produce injury and battery with serious bodily injury, with an admission that he served two prior prison terms. (Pen. Code, §§ 245, subd. (a)(1), 243, subd. (d), 667.5, subd. (b).) The trial court sentenced Brady, as agreed, to a low term of two years for the assault count and two years for the battery with serious bodily injury count, to be served concurrently. The trial court also imposed a two-year sentence for the prior prison terms served. (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b).) The trial court imposed a $1,600 restitution fine and a $1,600 parole revocation restitution fine, but did not award presentence custody credits because Brady was confined as a mentally disordered offender at Atascadero State Hospital at the time of the crimes.

We appointed counsel to represent Brady in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no issues.

On November 6, 2007, we directed Brady's counsel to inform him that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response from him.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Brady's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

We concur: COFFEE, J., PERREN, J.


Summaries of

People v. Brady

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Feb 4, 2008
No. B194594 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 4, 2008)
Case details for

People v. Brady

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BILL BRADY, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division

Date published: Feb 4, 2008

Citations

No. B194594 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 4, 2008)