From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1968
238 N.E.2d 923 (N.Y. 1968)

Opinion

Argued April 17, 1968

Decided May 29, 1968

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, WILFRED A. WALTEMADE, J.

Daniel C. Schaffer and Anthony F. Marra for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( John J. Moyna and H. Richard Uviller of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and case remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for the limited purpose of granting a new hearing of defendant's motion to withdraw his plea so that he might have the assistance of counsel in attempting to show why he should have been allowed to withdraw his plea of guilty to the indictment ( People v. Rozzell, 20 N.Y.2d 712; People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338).

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, KEATING and BREITEL. Judges SCILEPPI, BERGAN and JASEN dissent and vote to affirm on the ground that the position taken by defense counsel on the application to withdraw the plea did not constitute a deprivation of constitutional rights.


Summaries of

People v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1968
238 N.E.2d 923 (N.Y. 1968)
Case details for

People v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSEPH BOYD, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1968

Citations

238 N.E.2d 923 (N.Y. 1968)
238 N.E.2d 923
291 N.Y.S.2d 816

Citing Cases

People v. Driscoll

By this holding we do not mean to infer that counsel did not act with the utmost good faith. In fact he did…

People v. Taylor

Nevertheless, defendant in effect had to proceed pro se on his application to withdraw his guilty plea made…