From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bosse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 2005
23 A.D.3d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

KA 04-02095.

November 10, 2005.

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Ronald A. Cicoria, J.), rendered August 10, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of, inter alia, burglary in the third degree.

BRIDGET L. FIELD, BATAVIA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THOMAS E. MORAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, GENESEO (ERIC R. SCHIENER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Present: Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of, inter alia, burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying her request for youthful offender status ( see People v. McDaniels, 19 AD3d 1071, 1072; People v. Jefferson, 303 AD2d 1009, 1010, lv denied 100 NY2d 621). We decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender ( see People v. Potter, 13 AD3d 1191, lv denied 4 NY3d 889; People v. Frens, 299 AD2d 893, lv denied 99 NY2d 614; People v. Phillips, 289 AD2d 1021, 1022).


Summaries of

People v. Bosse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 2005
23 A.D.3d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Bosse

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CYNTHIA L. BOSSE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8444
803 N.Y.S.2d 472

Citing Cases

People v. Randleman

The record reflects that the court "carefully considered the request to be considered a youthful offender and…

People v. Martinez

We conclude that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was knowingly and voluntarily entered ( see People…