From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Bookman

Court of Appeals of New York.
Sep 13, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5963 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

09-13-2016

The PEOPLE & c., Respondent, v. David BOOKMAN, Appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, Appellate Advocates, New York City (Paul S. Laisure and Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (Antara D. Kanth of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, Appellate Advocates, New York City (Paul S. Laisure and Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (Antara D. Kanth of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 ), order affirmed. The lower courts' determinations on the suppression motion, which involve mixed questions of law and fact, have support in the record and, thus, are beyond our further review.

Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.


Summaries of

People v. Bookman

Court of Appeals of New York.
Sep 13, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5963 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Bookman

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE & c., Respondent, v. David BOOKMAN, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Sep 13, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5963 (N.Y. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5963
39 N.Y.S.3d 107
61 N.E.3d 506

Citing Cases

People v. Romero

An officer is not chargeable with knowledge of the legal registration and equipment requirements of every…

People v. Romero

An officer is not chargeable with knowledge of the legal registration and equipment requirements of every…